![]() |
Michael Fassbender (left), Lupita Nyong'o (center) and Chiwetel Ejiofor (right) turn in performances as relentless as Steve McQueen's direction in "12 Years a Slave."
|
Believe
the hype.
McQueen
is one of the most talented directors in the world at the moment. Unrelenting
and brutal in his craft, his previous film, “Shame” (2011), an experimental
character study about sex addiction, though critically acclaimed, was ignored
by the academy largely due to its controversial subject matter. “12 Years a
Slave” will not have the same problem.
The film, though brutal, features
an incredible true story of significant historical importance. It dramatizes
the autobiography of the same name by Solomon Northup, a free black man who was
kidnapped and sold into slavery in 1941. Northup, brilliantly played by
Chiwetel Ejiofor (“Children of Men”) in a breakout role of sorts, witnesses and
endures the unspeakable cruelty of slavery.
True to his honest style of
filmmaking, McQueen seems set on exposing slavery in the antebellum South
exactly as it was with no violent detail withheld. He remains at a distance,
not judging any of his characters but rather letting their actions speak for
them.
When first tricked and kidnapped,
Northup is savagely whipped for insisting that he is a free man. Most
contemporary directors would construct this scene with one quick cut into the
action of the abuse and move on. McQueen lets the camera linger uncut for
several minutes while Northup is whipped over and over again. The violence is
not highly stylized like it would be in a Quentin Tarantino film; it is simply
unequivocal. Needless to say, this film is not for the faint of heart.
During the initial whipping scene,
Northup’s captor repeatedly calls for him to admit he is a slave. But Northup
refuses to give in to his injustice, and though his persistence continually
results in unfathomable cruelty on Louisiana plantations, he holds hope that he
will one day see his wife and two kids again.
The fact that the story is true is
combined with McQueen’s uncompromising direction makes the film an incredibly
powerful experience. It’s acting, however, takes it to an entirely different
level. Ejiofor’s depiction of Northup is the stuff of legends and should set
him as an absolute lock for a best actor nomination. Mark him down as one to
watch. Michael Fassbender (in his third collaboration with McQueen) is also a
force as the most evil of Northup’s slave owners, Edwin Epps, and the
supporting cast featuring the likes of Paul Dano (“Little Miss Sunshine”) and
Sarah Paulson (“Mud”) all turn in compelling performances.
The biggest surprise of the film is
undoubtedly the performance of Lupita Nyong’o in her American film debut.
Nyong’o plays Patsey, a slave so badly abused that she becomes suicidal. Her
ability to simply handle the sheer emotional weight of her role in a debut is
amazing in itself, but she masters it. Like Ejiofor, she is one to look out
for.
All of this is more than enough to
make a great film. But “12 Years a Slave” packs yet another punch: the absolute
centerpiece of the year. In the scene, Northup is forced by Epps to whip
fellow slave Patsey, who he has grown close to. It is shot in one continuous
take and lasts for over 5 minutes. The camera weaves in and out of the action,
shifting with the ebbs and flows of the scene. Dialogue gives way to a
heart-wrenching score by famed composer Hans Zimmer (“Rain Man,” “Gladiator”).
Characters are broken; humanity questioned. One must simply see the shot in
order to experience its power and horror.
The film's negatives really
all boil down to taste. Those with weak stomachs will not like it. Those who
prefer light and entertaining films will probably not like it either. Fans of intimately detailed dramas and historical epics will
love it, however. Tonally the film is much like McQueen’s first feature,
“Hunger,” a dramatization of the prison experience and hunger strike of Irish
Republican Army protestor Bobby Sand’s (played by Fassbender) in 1981. A
steady, controlled pace accentuates the shocking content displayed in each.
Both films are based on true historical accounts and while “12 Years a Slave”
may resonate with audiences as a tale of a more horrifying injustice, they are
very similarly crafted.
Though the acts depicted are despicable and often hard to watch, it is hard not to be compelled by the film’s historical weight. “12 Years a Slave” is important because it strives to depict uncensored truth, and all of its intangibles make it perhaps the first great film of the decade. (Grade: A+)
No comments:
Post a Comment